BUILD · AUTOMATE · GROW — back-office automation and AI agents for estate agents, hotels and restaurants. London & Madeira.
Comparison

Us, or another pair of hands?

The real competitor to automation is usually a person. Here is the arithmetic without a thumb on the scale, including the parts that favour hiring.

Book a callBuilt for your business · yours to keepSee our prices
01The arithmetic

What a part-time receptionist actually costs

Twenty hours a week at a realistic London rate. Figures are indicative and you should check them against your own payroll.

 Part-time receptionistW2 Systems
Gross pay~£15,600 a year20 hrs/week at £15/hr
Employer National Insurance and pension~£2,400 a year
Build or recruitment£500–£2,000 onceadvertising, time, traininga fraction of it
Running costa fraction of itplus AI usage at cost, typically £5–£20
Hours covered20 a week168 a week
Holiday, sickness, noticeStatutory, and you cover the gapNone
Roughly, year one£18,500–£20,000a fraction of it

Rates checked against typical London part-time administrative pay in 2026. Employer National Insurance and auto-enrolment pension are estimates; your accountant will have the exact figures.

02The part nobody else will tell you

Hire the person if any of these are true

Hire someone

a person wins here

  • The job is mostly in the room: greeting people, handling keys, making coffee, chasing a contractor down the corridor
  • Your enquiries are genuinely complex or emotional every time
  • You want someone who spots what nobody asked for
  • You are growing and need capacity you can point at other work next month
  • Under about fifteen calls or messages a week, the maths simply does not justify a build

Automate it

where we win

  • The same twenty questions arrive every week and the answers are in a sheet
  • The volume is spiky: quiet all morning, then eight calls during service
  • Your problem is evenings, weekends and the hours nobody is paid to cover
  • You already have staff and they are being interrupted rather than under-occupied
  • You want the same answer given the same way every single time

The best answer for most businesses our size is both. The automation takes the repetitive eighty per cent, and the person you already employ gets their afternoon back to do the work that actually needs them. We have never yet built something whose purpose was to make someone redundant, and we would tell you if that is what you were asking for.

Next step

Twenty minutes on the phone. Then a straight answer.

Tell us what you keep doing by hand. We'll tell you which workflow pays back first, what it costs, and whether it's worth doing at all. If it isn't, we say so.

WhatsApp us
Book a callWhatsApp